Skip to content
Embrace ID

Pricing and engagement models

Choose the working model that matches your risk, pace, and internal capacity.

This is not a rate card. It is a practical guide to how Embrace ID scopes fixed builds, ongoing retainers, and dedicated team partnerships so commercial expectations are clear before delivery starts.

Model fit map

Mockup
3clear engagement paths
0pricing guesses before discovery
1recommended model after fit review

Discovery turns budget anxiety into a delivery shape.

We compare scope certainty, urgency, internal capacity, and post-launch ownership before naming the commercial model.

Engagement models

Three commercial shapes, one practical delivery standard.

Each model includes the same emphasis on clear communication, maintainable engineering, and business-first scope decisions. The difference is cadence, certainty, and how much capacity you need over time.

Fixed scope

Project-Based

01

A defined release with agreed outcomes, scope boundaries, timeline, and commercial commitment before build starts.

Best for

  • New MVPs or first versions of a business workflow
  • Website, portal, or internal tool builds with clear boundaries
  • Teams that need a predictable release plan for procurement

Typical timeline

Typically 4–12 weeks after discovery and scope confirmation.

What's included

  • Discovery and release shaping
  • UX/UI direction and technical planning
  • Implementation, QA, launch, and handover
  • Post-launch warranty window for agreed scope
Scope a Fixed Project

Monthly rhythm

Retainer / Ongoing

02

A monthly commitment for teams that need continuous improvements, support, integrations, and product iteration.

Best for

  • Existing platforms that need steady product improvements
  • Operational systems with support, analytics, or integration needs
  • Roadmaps that change as the business learns from users

Typical timeline

Monthly sprint cadence with priorities reviewed every cycle.

What's included

  • Backlog planning and priority reviews
  • Feature development and technical improvements
  • Maintenance, monitoring, and support allocation
  • Regular demos, delivery notes, and roadmap input
Discuss a Retainer

Extended capacity

Dedicated Team

03

An embedded product and engineering capacity model for larger clients that need a longer-term delivery partner.

Best for

  • Larger product roadmaps with multiple workstreams
  • Companies that need senior engineering capacity without hiring first
  • Longer programs where architecture and delivery rituals matter

Typical timeline

Best for 3+ month engagements with a shared roadmap.

What's included

  • Dedicated delivery team allocation
  • Product, engineering, QA, and release rituals
  • Architecture stewardship and technical documentation
  • Stakeholder communication and roadmap governance
Plan Team Extension

Recommendation logic

We recommend the model after checking three signals.

The right model should reduce delivery risk, not force your project into a package that only looks simple on the website.

01

How certain is the scope?

Clear outcomes and boundaries point toward project-based work. Moving targets usually need a retainer or dedicated team rhythm.

02

How much internal capacity exists?

If your team can own product direction but needs engineering execution, the model differs from a partner-led discovery and delivery setup.

03

How long should the system keep evolving?

One launch, continuous improvement, and multi-quarter product programs need different review cadences and commercial structures.

Pricing FAQ

A few commercial questions before the first call.

These answers set expectations without turning the page into a price list. Exact estimates come after discovery.

No. Scope, integrations, risk, timeline, and support expectations change the commercial shape too much for a useful public price list. We use discovery to recommend the right model and explain what drives the estimate.

Model recommendation

Tell us about your project and we'll recommend the right model.

Send a short brief with the workflow, timeline, current tools, and what needs to change. We will reply with the clearest next commercial path before asking for a full specification.